Philosophy as anti-sophistic

dc.contributor	Graduate Program in Philosophy.
dc.contributor.advisor	Voss, Stephen,
dc.contributor.author	Yiğit, Rezzan İlke.
dc.date.accessioned	2023-03-16T11:55:04Z
dc.date.available	2023-03-16T11:55:04Z
dc.date.issued	2004.
dc.identifier.other	PHIL 2004 Y54
dc.identifier.uri	http://digitalarchive.boun.edu.tr/handle/123456789/16169
dc.description.abstract	The present thesis is an attempt to give a definition of philosophy by looking at the philosopher's definition of sophistry. My main goal has been to understand the conceptual framework in which sophistry and philosophy ara positioned as polar concepts in order to question if there can be a theorethical basis for demarcating philosohy from false philosophy. I tried to focus on two important characters in Ancient Greece. The first one is Plato, the first philosopher, and the other is Gorgias, the father of sophistry. The comparison between their thoughts is intended to see how the philosopher has constructed himself as the opposite of the sophist.
dc.format.extent	30cm.
dc.publisher	Thesis (M.A.)-Bogazici University. Institute for Graduate Studies in Social Sciences, 2004.
dc.relation	Includes appendices.
dc.relation	Includes appendices.
dc.subject.lcsh	Rhetoric, Ancient.
dc.subject.lcsh	Sophists (Greek philosophy)
dc.title	Philosophy as anti-sophistic
dc.format.pages	vii, 97 leaves;