Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor Graduate Program in Chemical Engineering.
dc.contributor.advisor Haliloğlu, Türkan.
dc.contributor.author Ersoy, Akarun Ayça.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-15T10:14:15Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-15T10:14:15Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.other CHE 2022 E77
dc.identifier.uri http://digitalarchive.boun.edu.tr/handle/123456789/19868
dc.description.abstract The ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC transporters) translocate sub strates across membranes by ATP binding and hydrolysis. To understand the com plex structural dynamics, transporters were investigated on three case studies: het erodimeric multidrug exporter TmrAB, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), and manganese ion importer PsaBC. Anisotropic Network Model Langevin Dynamics (ANM-LD) simulations were performed between four different con formations of TmrAB. The analysis for each transition revealed the allosteric couplings between the ATP binding in nucleotide binding domains (NBD) and extracellular gates on transmembrane domains (TMD). Transfer Entropy (TE) calculations showed that TMDs and NDBs of TmrAB become drivers at different stages during the translocation cycle. The ANM-LD simulations of dephosphorylated to phosphorylated CFTR transi tion revealed that the initial movements in the NBDs are followed by the movement of the gating areas in TM. The causal relationships between these movements were sup ported by TE calculations. CFTR potentiator drug Ivacaftor has been shown to have a global effect, mimicking the effects of ATP binding and gating residues. Corrector drug Lumacaftor has a local effect on TM1, 2, 3, and 6. The dynamics of PsaBC was characterized using TE calculations, and testable predictions were made. Four possi ble gating residues were identified along with an allosteric pocket on TM8. Finally, TE calculations of many ABC transporters showed the differences and similarities be tween different types. Type I transporters were shown to be controlled by TMDs in the inward facing (IF) conformation, and NBDs and substrate binding protein (SBP) in the outward facing (OF) conformation. Type II transporters were always driven by NBDs, regardless of conformation. Type IV transporters showed more variability, but for most, TMDs are driving for IF and NBDs are driving for OF conformations. Dynamic characterization methods show potential in classifying ABC transporters.
dc.publisher Thesis (M.S.) - Bogazici University. Institute for Graduate Studies in Science and Engineering, 2022.
dc.subject.lcsh Carrier proteins.
dc.title Structural dynamics of ABC transporters
dc.format.pages xvi, 87 leaves


Bu öğenin dosyaları

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

Dijital Arşivde Ara


Göz at

Hesabım